Thank you again for your assistance in evaluating this paper.
J. G.
Editor-in-Chief
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your paper for publication.
Your sincerely
Prof. S. T.
Reviewing Editor
If you find that you have a conflict of interest, or due to unforeseen circumstances, you are unable to complete your review, please contact the office immediately.
We urge you not to provide reviews based on images that have been degraded by the electronic submission process. There are a number of ways we can work with you to provide adequate images for review.
J. G.
Editor-in-Chief
You will find this paper in a category of manuscripts called “Manuscripts with decisions” and you may initiate the process of submitting your revision by clicking on the link titled “create revised manuscript”.
Yours sincerely,
K.E.
This is to confirm that we have received your review for the manuscript referenced above. We appreciate the time that you have contributed to this important component of the peer review process.
Kind regards,
L. P.
Editor
This e-mail is a notification that your account on Manuscript Central site has been modified. Thank you for your participation.
Sincerely,
Editorial Office
This is a reminder that your review of the following manuscript is DUE TODAY:
Thank you.
Editorial Staff
I have now received three reviews from highly qualified experts in the field and I have also read your manuscript. Not all three reviewers agree on the merits of the paper, but the majority is critical: Reviewer A only asks for a minor revision, but reviewers B and C agree that this paper is not suitable for publication in a journal like [ours].
Sincerely,
P.H.
Associate Editor
Can you please let me know if the authors have addressed your concerns and whether this manuscript is now suitable for publication? To access the manuscript, you may click on the link below (which will take you right to the score sheet).
Regards,
T.
Associate Editor
With this in mind, I would be very grateful if, in considering the paper, you would assess whether it is sufficiently novel and important to warrant inclusion in a journal that is currently having to reject more than 60% of submitted work. The ratings that you are asked to provide on significance, originality and quality have become more relevant to the decision process; it would help us greatly if you provided an expert rating on these criteria, bearing in mind that manuscripts with an average score of 3 or worse are unlikely to be accepted.
Kind regards,
L.P.
Editor
Thank you for your enquiry about submitting a manuscript. I have discussed your abstract with my colleagues and regret that we cannot encourage submission of the full manuscript.
Yours sincerely,
A.W.L., PhD
Associate Editor
